Xerox never comes up with anything original.
   Xerox never comes up with anything original. Saturday - 22nd November, 2008 - 01:59:15 

Site Menu  
 
Home
Web News
Reviews
Previews
Guides
Case Gallery
Contact Us
About Us
Sponsors
Links
 
     

  Visitors  
   
     

   HDD Article : IBM Deskstar 40GV »  
 

 

 IBM Deskstar 40GV - IOMeter
   
 Date  : Aug 31st, 2001
 Category  : Storage
 Manufacturer   : IBM
 Author  : Jin-Wei Tioh
Testbed IOMeter - Total I/Os Per Second Methodology

HDD Load Access Pattern
File Server Workstation Database Video
Workstation
IBM Deskstar 40GV (40.0GB ATA-100) Linear 71.66 85.15 71.79 3136.53
Light 106.22 118.65 104.63 3504.76
Moderate 128.00 141.30 126.62 3504.72
Heavy 143.43 156.94 142.72 3500.80
Quantum Fireball lct20 (10.0GB ATA-100) Linear 50.77 60.35 50.73 2189.65
Light 73.79 83.18 72.57 2189.88
Moderate 84.51 95.70 84.27 2190.18
Heavy 89.85 101.50 90.22 2190.13
Seagate U Series 5 (40.0GB ATA-100) Linear 51.31 59.15 50.14 2823.54
Light 66.44 73.16 58.91 2854.19
Moderate 81.10 87.08 64.71 2854.29
Heavy 93.89 96.78 77.95 2854.12

The Deskstar 40GV really starts to shine in IOMeter. A quick glance at the table shows the 40GV as having the highest number of I/Os per second under all loads and access patterns.

Interestingly, the 5400 RPM Seagate U5 does not seem to fare as well compared to the 4500 RPM Fireball lct20, generally scoring lower except under the Video Workstation access pattern. The purpose of the Video Workstation access pattern (which consists of 100% sequential writes) is to simulate a digital NLE environment, where video is captured to the hard drive. Thus, the faster a hard drive can write, the more suitable it is for storing bandwidth intensive data like digitized video. This seems to be more of Seagate's forte.

 Print this article Conclusion

 E-mail this article

 Discuss this article

 
 
     


Copyright © 2000-2005 BlueSmoke. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Site Design by Jin-Wei Tioh

Sitemap