The Universe is ending. Please logoff now.
   The Universe is ending. Please logoff now. Saturday - 22nd November, 2008 - 02:18:14 

Site Menu  
 
Home
Web News
Reviews
Previews
Guides
Case Gallery
Contact Us
About Us
Sponsors
Links
 
     

  Visitors  
   
     

   HDD Article : IBM Deskstar 60GXP »  
 

 

 IBM Deskstar 60GXP - IOMeter
   
 Date  : Aug 31st, 2001
 Category  : Storage
 Manufacturer   : IBM
 Author  : Jin-Wei Tioh
Testbed IOMeter - Total I/Os Per Second Methodology

HDD Load Access Pattern
File Server Workstation Database Video
Workstation
IBM Deskstar 60GXP (40.0GB ATA-100) Linear 71.67 85.15 71.79 3136.53
Light 106.22 118.65 104.63 3504.76
Moderate 128.00 141.30 126.62 3504.72
Heavy 143.43 156.94 142.72 3504.80
IBM Deskstar 75GXP (20.0GB ATA-100) Linear 75.49 89.50 74.24 2951.34
Light 105.94 120.65 103.21 3125.50
Moderate 126.03 143.25 124.70 3123.92
Heavy 141.94 160.31 141.89 3073.09
Quantum Fireball AS (20.0GB ATA-100) Linear 73.28 84.93 77.49 2788.41
Light 95.74 95.68 83.45 2838.38
Moderate 106.66 103.55 103.15 2833.93
Heavy 114.29 102.67 110.54 2830.29
Seagate Barracuda ATA II (30.0GB ATA-100) Linear 66.25 77.56 63.49 3116.63
Light 82.51 90.96 71.89 3304.99
Moderate 92.32 100.48 76.37 3303.17
Heavy 106.71 109.83 87.78 3303.24

The Deskstar 60GXP really starts to shine in IOMeter. A quick glance at the table shows the 6OGXP as having the highest number of I/Os per second under all loads and access patterns. But hold on a minute, how can it be the best drive when it is outscored by the 75GXP? It is our experience that lower capacity members of a drive family typically give higher IOMeter scores than their higher capacity siblings, primarily in the Workstation access pattern and Linear load scores. Therefore, it would be reasonable to conclude that the 75GXP's scores are somewhat "artificially" inflated, ie. a 40GB 75GXP would give at best, the same scores, if not slightly lower, than those of the 60GXP.

Interestingly, while the Seagate Barracuda ATA II has generally been lacking behind so far, it is practically nipping at the heels of the 60GXP and 75GXP under the Video Workstation access pattern. The purpose of the Video Workstation access pattern (which consists of 100% sequential writes) is to simulate a digital NLE environment, where video is captured to the hard drive. Thus, the faster a hard drive can write, the more suitable it is for storing bandwidth intensive data like digitized video. As demonstrated in our other HDD articles, this seems to be more of Seagate's forte.

 Print this article Conclusion

 E-mail this article

 Discuss this article

 
 
     


Copyright © 2000-2005 BlueSmoke. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Site Design by Jin-Wei Tioh

Sitemap